Friedrichshof Commune

A far-left Austrian commune known for its radical social experiment and authoritarian practices, leading to the leader’s conviction for child abuse.


The Friedrichshof Commune, officially known as the Aktionsanalytische Organisation (AAO), was a controversial far-left commune established in 1972 by Austrian artist Otto Muehl. Located in Friedrichshof, outside Vienna, this radical experiment in communal living operated until 1990, leaving behind a complex legacy of artistic innovation, social experimentation, and ultimately, abuse and disillusionment.

Formation and Ideology

Otto Muehl, a prominent figure in Viennese Actionism, founded the Friedrichshof Commune with the aim of dismantling established social norms and beliefs, with a vision that was heavily influenced by the psychoanalytic theories of Wilhelm Reich, particularly those concerning sexuality and politics. Muehl sought to create a community that would break down traditional bourgeois values, especially the nuclear family structure, in favor of communal living and uninhibited sexual expression.

The commune’s ideology centered around the practice of “Aktionanalyse” or “action analysis,” a form of group therapy developed by Muehl. This practice involved public confessions, role-playing, and often sexually explicit performances, intended to break down social barriers and individual inhibitions. These sessions were frequently recorded on video, with the resulting footage becoming part of the commune’s artistic output.

Structure and Daily Life

At its peak, the Friedrichshof Commune housed around 600 members who lived according to principles of communal property, direct democracy, and radical self-expression. The community was largely self-sufficient, with members engaging in agricultural work, construction, and various crafts. They also operated businesses, including a restaurant and a publishing house, which helped to support the community financially.

The commune’s lifestyle was marked by extreme social experiments, including partner swapping and communal child-rearing. Children were educated on-site, following an alternative curriculum that emphasized creativity and self-expression. The community’s practices included separating children from their biological parents to break traditional familial bonds, a practice that would later be criticized for its psychological impact on the children involved.

Authoritarian Structure and Controversial Practices

Despite its outward appearance of an idyllic, free-loving community, the Friedrichshof Commune was characterized by Muehl’s authoritarian rule. He established a hierarchical structure within the community, ranking members based on his preferences. This contradicted the commune’s purported egalitarian principles and created an environment often described as oppressive and cult-like.

Muehl’s control extended to various aspects of communal life, including sexual practices. Monogamous relationships were forbidden, and sexual initiation rituals were imposed on young members, starting at age 14. These practices, along with the commune’s overall structure, would later be scrutinized for their coercive nature and potential for abuse.

Artistic Activities and Cultural Impact

Despite its controversial nature, the Friedrichshof Commune had a significant influence on artistic expression, particularly within the realm of Viennese Actionism. Muehl continued his artistic activities throughout the commune’s existence, painting and directing films that often incorporated elements of the commune’s daily life and experiences.

The commune attracted a diverse group of individuals, including artists, intellectuals, and those seeking an alternative lifestyle. It became a subject of public fascination, receiving media attention and visits from various artists and curious outsiders. The artistic output of the commune, including its video recordings and performances, contributed to the broader cultural dialogue about art, sexuality, and social norms.

Legal Troubles and Dissolution

In the late 1980s, the darker aspects of the commune began to surface as former members spoke out about their experiences. In 1991, Otto Muehl was convicted of widespread sexual abuse of minors who lived in the commune. He was sentenced to seven years in prison for these offenses, effectively marking the end of the Friedrichshof Commune as it had existed.

Following Muehl’s imprisonment, the commune underwent a process of dissolution and transformation. Many members left, while others attempted to reorganize the community on a new basis. The property was eventually converted into a more conventional eco-village, with some former commune members continuing to live there under different arrangements.